Author: Jonathan W. Hak KC

Expert Witness TestimonyForensic Video Analysis

Canadian Court Restricts Evidence of Forensic Video Analyst in Murder Trial

In preparation for a Canadian homicide prosecution, a forensic video analyst performed several technical and analytical processes on video images that captured relevant events. The defence objected to most of the work performed by the analyst and in a pre-trial motion during which the analyst gave extensive testimony, the trial judge ruled on...
Expert Witness TestimonyForensic Video Analysis

Image Technology and Visual Literacy Issues in the Rittenhouse Trial

The November 2021 trial in State of Wisconsin v. Rittenhouse garnered significant media attention across the United States, in part because of its rather sensational facts, and in part because it was televised. Some interesting video technology and visual literacy issues arose during the trial that have allowed for some reflection and commentary...
AuthenticationForensic Video Analysis

Case Study: Social Media Video Ruled Inadmissible

Social media sites have provided both benefits and challenges to investigators, counsel, and the court. The benefits they can provide are manifold. The amount of communication that is conducted through social media platforms is staggering, largely relegating voice communication via telephone a place in the history books. Many people who use social media...
AuthenticationForensic Video Analysis

The Silent Witness Theory for the Admission of CCTV Video Evidence is Alive and Well: Case Examples Presented

Video evidence does not gain admission simply because counsel tenders it for entry at trial. It must be supportable under either the illustrative evidence theory or the silent witness theory. Both theories are long-standing common law tests used to regulate the admission of video evidence in the courtroom. Under the illustrative evidence theory,...
AuthenticationForensic Video Analysis

Case Study: Homeowner Authenticates Burglary Video Recordings

A recent appellate decision from Maryland provides a helpful example of how homeowners (and by extension business owners) can be utilized to authenticate video recordings and illustrates who is permitted to express an opinion on the identification of someone shown in the recordings.  In Frayne v. State of Maryland, 2021 WL 5358880 (Court of...